2004 Buick LeSabre vs. 2001 Lancia Nea
To start off, 2004 Buick LeSabre is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Lancia Nea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Lancia Nea would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2001 Lancia Nea. (148 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 2001 Lancia Nea. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 247 kg more than 2001 Lancia Nea. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Lancia Nea (314 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Buick LeSabre. (312 Nm). This means 2001 Lancia Nea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Buick LeSabre.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Buick LeSabre | 2001 Lancia Nea | |
| Make | Buick | Lancia |
| Model | LeSabre | Nea |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2445 cc |
| Horse Power | 205 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 314 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1617 kg | 1370 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2590 mm |
