2004 Buick LeSabre vs. 2005 Rover 75
To start off, 2005 Rover 75 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2005 Rover 75. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 214 kg more than 2005 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 75. (215 Nm). This means 2004 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick LeSabre | 2005 Rover 75 | |
Make | Buick | Rover |
Model | LeSabre | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1796 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 312 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.2:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1415 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 65 L |