2004 Buick LeSabre vs. 2009 Mazda 5

To start off, 2009 Mazda 5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 5. (108 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 15 kg more than 2009 Mazda 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick LeSabre (312 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 5. (310 Nm). This means 2004 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 5.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Buick LeSabre 2009 Mazda 5
Make Buick Mazda
Model LeSabre 5
Year Released 2004 2009
Body Type Sedan Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 205 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 312 Nm 310 Nm
Engine Bore Size 97.1 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 16.7:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1629 kg 1614 kg
Vehicle Length 5090 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1870 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1620 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2760 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 10.2 L/100km 6.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 70 L 60 L