2004 Buick LeSabre vs. 2010 Volvo C30
To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick LeSabre (205 HP) has 104 more horse power than 2010 Volvo C30. (101 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 178 kg more than 2010 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick LeSabre | 2010 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | LeSabre | C30 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 205 HP | 101 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 60 L |