2004 Buick Rainier vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Buick Rainier is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Rainier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Rainier (276 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Rainier should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick Rainier weights approximately 929 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Rainier (380 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Rainier | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Buick | Triumph |
Model | Rainier | 2000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2099 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 64 L |