2004 Buick Rainier vs. 1967 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2004 Buick Rainier is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,749 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Buick Rainier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1967 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Rainier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Rainier | 1967 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | Rainier | Camaro |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4194 cc | 5749 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 271 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2750 mm |