2004 Buick Rainier vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2004 Buick Rainier is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Rainier (276 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (163 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Rainier should accelerate faster than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2004 Buick Rainier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Rainier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Rainier (380 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. (325 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Rainier | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | Rainier | Camaro |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 4995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 325 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 94.9 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 88.4 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 76 L |