2004 Buick Rainier vs. 1983 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2004 Buick Rainier is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Rainier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Rainier (275 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Rainier should accelerate faster than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Rainier (387 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Rainier | 1983 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | Rainier | Camaro |
Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 387 Nm | 179 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2580 mm |