2004 Buick Rainier vs. 1986 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2004 Buick Rainier is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Rainier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Rainier (276 HP) has 187 more horse power than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Rainier should accelerate faster than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Because 2004 Buick Rainier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Rainier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Rainier (387 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro. (179 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Chevrolet Camaro.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Buick Rainier | 1986 Chevrolet Camaro | |
| Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
| Model | Rainier | Camaro |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2474 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 276 HP | 89 HP |
| Torque | 387 Nm | 179 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2580 mm |
