2004 Buick Rainier vs. 2010 Mazda 3
To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Buick Rainier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Buick Rainier would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Rainier is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Rainier (276 HP) has 128 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 3. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Rainier should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 3.
Because 2004 Buick Rainier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Mazda 3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Rainier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Rainier (387 Nm) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 3. (360 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Rainier will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Rainier | 2010 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Rainier | 3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2184 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 387 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1755 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 55 L |