2004 Buick Rainier vs. 2012 Ford F-350
To start off, 2012 Ford F-350 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Buick Rainier. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Buick Rainier would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford F-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford F-350 (385 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 2004 Buick Rainier. (276 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford F-350 should accelerate faster than 2004 Buick Rainier.
Because 2004 Buick Rainier is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Ford F-350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Rainier will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford F-350 (548 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Buick Rainier. (380 Nm). This means 2012 Ford F-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Buick Rainier.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Rainier | 2012 Ford F-350 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Rainier | F-350 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 276 HP | 385 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 548 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 132 L |