2004 Buick Regal vs. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik
To start off, 2004 Buick Regal is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Talbot Saoutchik would be higher. At 4,480 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. (169 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Talbot Saoutchik weights approximately 250 kg more than 2004 Buick Regal.
Because 1952 Talbot Saoutchik is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Talbot Saoutchik. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Buick Regal | 1952 Talbot Saoutchik | |
| Make | Buick | Talbot |
| Model | Regal | Saoutchik |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 4480 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 201 HP | 169 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1800 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3160 mm |
