2004 Buick Regal vs. 1953 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2004 Buick Regal is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1953 Talbot T 26. (197 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot T 26 weights approximately 12 kg more than 2004 Buick Regal.
Because 1953 Talbot T 26 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Talbot T 26. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Buick Regal | 1953 Talbot T 26 | |
| Make | Buick | Talbot |
| Model | Regal | T 26 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1953 |
| Engine Size | 3786 cc | 4482 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 251 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1890 mm |
