2004 Buick Regal vs. 1963 Triumph Herald
To start off, 2004 Buick Regal is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph Herald. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph Herald would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1963 Triumph Herald. (50 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph Herald. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick Regal weights approximately 709 kg more than 1963 Triumph Herald. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Triumph Herald is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Triumph Herald. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Regal (305 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph Herald. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph Herald.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Regal | 1963 Triumph Herald | |
Make | Buick | Triumph |
Model | Regal | Herald |
Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1147 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 50 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 69.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 841 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2330 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 29 L |