2004 Buick Regal vs. 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle
To start off, 2004 Buick Regal is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle would be higher. At 6,478 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (375 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 2004 Buick Regal. (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle should accelerate faster than 2004 Buick Regal. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle weights approximately 50 kg more than 2004 Buick Regal. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle (563 Nm) has 258 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Buick Regal. (305 Nm). This means 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Buick Regal.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Regal | 1967 Chevrolet Chevelle | |
Make | Buick | Chevrolet |
Model | Regal | Chevelle |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 6478 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 563 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1840 mm |