2004 Buick Regal vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Buick Regal is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (197 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick Regal weights approximately 273 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Regal (312 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 177 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2004 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Buick Regal | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Buick | Triumph |
| Model | Regal | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 312 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1521 kg | 1248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2700 mm |
