2004 Buick Regal vs. 1985 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Buick Regal is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 131 more horse power than 1985 Mitsubishi Colt. (70 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1985 Mitsubishi Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick Regal weights approximately 650 kg more than 1985 Mitsubishi Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Regal (305 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mitsubishi Colt. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mitsubishi Colt.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Regal | 1985 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Buick | Mitsubishi |
Model | Regal | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1439 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 102 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2390 mm |