2004 Buick Regal vs. 1992 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2004 Buick Regal is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1992 Ford Tempo. (129 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1992 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick Regal weights approximately 403 kg more than 1992 Ford Tempo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Regal (388 Nm) has 184 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Ford Tempo. (204 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Regal | 1992 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Regal | Tempo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 204 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2540 mm |