2004 Buick Regal vs. 1992 Mini MK VI
To start off, 2004 Buick Regal is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mini MK VI. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mini MK VI would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 210 more horse power than 1992 Mini MK VI. (41 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1992 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick Regal weights approximately 978 kg more than 1992 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Regal (388 Nm) has 320 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mini MK VI. (68 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Regal | 1992 Mini MK VI | |
Make | Buick | Mini |
Model | Regal | MK VI |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 68 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2040 mm |