2004 Buick Regal vs. 1996 Ford Royale
To start off, 2004 Buick Regal is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Ford Royale would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 142 more horse power than 1996 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Royale.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Regal (388 Nm) has 215 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Ford Royale. (173 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Ford Royale.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Regal | 1996 Ford Royale | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Regal | Royale |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 173 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2560 mm |