2004 Buick Regal vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, both 2004 Buick Regal and 2004 Ford E-250 were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 772 kg more than 2004 Buick Regal.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Buick Regal. (388 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Buick Regal.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Regal | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Regal | E-250 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 388 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 132 L |