2004 Buick Regal vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda RX-8 (232 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2004 Buick Regal. (201 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 2004 Buick Regal.
Because 2007 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2007 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Regal (305 Nm) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Regal | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Buick | Mazda |
Model | Regal | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 201 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 305 Nm | 216 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |