2004 Buick Regal vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick Regal weights approximately 63 kg more than 2008 Rover 75.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Regal (388 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Buick Regal | 2008 Rover 75 | |
Make | Buick | Rover |
Model | Regal | 75 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 3786 cc | 2497 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 388 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 97 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 82.8 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1598 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4990 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 65 L |