2004 Buick Regal vs. 2012 Volkswagen Beetle

To start off, 2012 Volkswagen Beetle is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,786 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Buick Regal (251 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 2012 Volkswagen Beetle. (200 HP @ 5100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 2012 Volkswagen Beetle. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Buick Regal weights approximately 218 kg more than 2012 Volkswagen Beetle. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Buick Regal (388 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Volkswagen Beetle. (280 Nm). This means 2004 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Volkswagen Beetle.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Buick Regal 2012 Volkswagen Beetle
Make Buick Volkswagen
Model Regal Beetle
Year Released 2004 2012
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3786 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 251 HP 200 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5100 RPM
Torque 388 Nm 280 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1598 kg 1380 kg
Vehicle Length 4990 mm 4278 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 1808 mm
Vehicle Height 1440 mm 1486 mm
Wheelbase Size 2780 mm 2537 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 8.4 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 13.1 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 64 L 55 L