2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1941 GAZ M1
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 63 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 GAZ M1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 GAZ M1 would be higher. At 3,285 cc (4 cylinders), 1941 GAZ M1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1941 GAZ M1. (49 HP @ 2800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1941 GAZ M1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 420 kg more than 1941 GAZ M1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1941 GAZ M1 | |
Make | Cadillac | GAZ |
Model | CTS | M1 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1941 |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 3285 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2850 mm |