2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1947 Talbot T 26
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Talbot T 26. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Talbot T 26 would be higher. At 4,481 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Talbot T 26 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1947 Talbot T 26. (168 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1947 Talbot T 26. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 190 kg more than 1947 Talbot T 26. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1947 Talbot T 26 | |
Make | Cadillac | Talbot |
Model | CTS | T 26 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 4481 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3130 mm |