2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1948 Peugeot 202
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1948 Peugeot 202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1948 Peugeot 202 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 366 more horse power than 1948 Peugeot 202. (30 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1948 Peugeot 202. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 960 kg more than 1948 Peugeot 202. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1948 Peugeot 202 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Peugeot |
| Model | CTS | 202 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1948 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1133 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 396 HP | 30 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 78 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 785 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4120 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2460 mm |
