2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1949 Ford F
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Ford F would be higher.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1949 Ford F | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | CTS | F |
Year Released | 2004 | 1949 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1880 mm |