2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1949 Land Rover I
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Land Rover I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Land Rover I would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1949 Land Rover I. (51 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Land Rover I.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1949 Land Rover I | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | CTS | I |
Year Released | 2004 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 51 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |