2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1949 Simca 6
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca 6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca 6 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1949 Simca 6. (16 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1949 Simca 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1949 Simca 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1949 Simca 6 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Simca |
| Model | CTS | 6 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3173 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 16 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 570 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1330 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2010 mm |
