2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1951 DKW F 89
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 DKW F 89. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 DKW F 89 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1951 DKW F 89. (24 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1951 DKW F 89. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 926 kg more than 1951 DKW F 89. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1951 DKW F 89, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1951 DKW F 89 | |
Make | Cadillac | DKW |
Model | CTS | F 89 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 684 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 864 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2360 mm |