2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1952 Citroen 11
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Citroen 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Citroen 11 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 341 more horse power than 1952 Citroen 11. (55 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1952 Citroen 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 550 kg more than 1952 Citroen 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1952 Citroen 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1952 Citroen 11 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
| Model | CTS | 11 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1909 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 396 HP | 55 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3280 mm |
