2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1954 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1954 Maserati A6G. (148 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1954 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 740 kg more than 1954 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1954 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Cadillac | Maserati |
Model | CTS | A6G |
Year Released | 2004 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1985 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1050 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2560 mm |