2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1958 Cadillac 62
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 415 kg more than 2004 Cadillac CTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1958 Cadillac 62 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Cadillac |
| Model | CTS | 62 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1958 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 5979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 189 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1780 kg | 2195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3300 mm |
