2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1960 Suzuki Light
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Suzuki Light. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Suzuki Light would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 382 more horse power than 1960 Suzuki Light. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1960 Suzuki Light. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1205 kg more than 1960 Suzuki Light. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 502 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Suzuki Light. (34 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Suzuki Light.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1960 Suzuki Light | |
Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
Model | CTS | Light |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 358 cc |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 14 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 34 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2010 mm |