2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1962 BMW Isetta
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 BMW Isetta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 BMW Isetta would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP) has 383 more horse power than 1962 BMW Isetta. (13 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1962 BMW Isetta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1385 kg more than 1962 BMW Isetta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1962 BMW Isetta | |
| Make | Cadillac | BMW |
| Model | CTS | Isetta |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 1 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | single |
| Horse Power | 396 HP | 13 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 274 km/hour | 85 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 1 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 360 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 2300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 1510 mm |
