2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1963 Ferrari 156
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Ferrari 156. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Ferrari 156 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Ferrari 156 (187 HP @ 9500 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Ferrari 156 should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1318 kg more than 1963 Ferrari 156.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1963 Ferrari 156 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
| Model | CTS | 156 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1486 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1780 kg | 462 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1010 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2330 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 119 L |
