2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1967 Vauxhall Viva
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Vauxhall Viva. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Vauxhall Viva would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 327 more horse power than 1967 Vauxhall Viva. (69 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1967 Vauxhall Viva.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1967 Vauxhall Viva | |
Make | Cadillac | Vauxhall |
Model | CTS | Viva |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1159 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 69 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 77.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 61 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 274 km/hour | 145 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2440 mm |