2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1969 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (179 HP) has 98 more horse power than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 325 kg more than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (245 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Isuzu Bellel. (162 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Isuzu Bellel.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1969 Isuzu Bellel | |
| Make | Cadillac | Isuzu |
| Model | CTS | Bellel |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1991 cc |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 81 HP |
| Torque | 245 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 45 L |
