2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1970 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1970 Lotus Seven. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1970 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1970 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1970 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
Model | CTS | Seven |
Year Released | 2004 | 1970 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1557 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2240 mm |