2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1974 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 369 more horse power than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Because 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 499 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1974 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Suzuki |
| Model | CTS | LJ 20 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1974 |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 396 HP | 27 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 37 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
