2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1975 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 520 kg more than 1975 Nissan 240 C.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1975 Nissan 240 C | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | CTS | 240 C |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1982 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1780 kg | 1260 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2700 mm |
