2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1976 Fiat 128
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Fiat 128. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Fiat 128 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1976 Fiat 128. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1976 Fiat 128. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 914 kg more than 1976 Fiat 128. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Fiat 128, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1976 Fiat 128 | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | CTS | 128 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1116 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 876 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1600 mm |