2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1976 Mazda 929
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1976 Mazda 929. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1976 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 706 kg more than 1976 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Mazda 929. (134 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1976 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | 929 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1769 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 134 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.2 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1780 kg | 1074 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2520 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 55 L |