2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1977 Lancia A 112
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Lancia A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Lancia A 112 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1977 Lancia A 112.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1977 Lancia A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1977 Lancia A 112 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lancia |
Model | CTS | A 112 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 902 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 655 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2040 mm |