2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1979 Ford Ranchero
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Ford Ranchero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Ford Ranchero would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 1979 Ford Ranchero. (108 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1979 Ford Ranchero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 820 kg more than 1979 Ford Ranchero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 366 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Ford Ranchero. (170 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Ford Ranchero.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1979 Ford Ranchero | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Ranchero |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1992 cc |
| Horse Power | 396 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 170 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 925 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2300 mm |
