2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1979 Renault 12

To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Renault 12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Renault 12 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 1979 Renault 12. (53 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1979 Renault 12. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 642 kg more than 1979 Renault 12. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1979 Renault 12, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1979 Renault 12. (96 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1979 Renault 12.

Compare all specifications: