2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1979 TVR 3000
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 770 kg more than 1979 TVR 3000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1979 TVR 3000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | TVR |
| Model | CTS | 3000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1979 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3173 cc | 2994 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1020 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3940 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2290 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |
