2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 166 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1020 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
Model | CTS | 102 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2160 mm |