2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Citroen Visa
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Citroen Visa. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Citroen Visa would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1982 Citroen Visa. (80 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1982 Citroen Visa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 975 kg more than 1982 Citroen Visa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Citroen Visa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Citroen Visa. (110 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Citroen Visa.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1982 Citroen Visa | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | CTS | Visa |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1360 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 80 HP |
Torque | 300 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 66 L |